QUASAR Induction Study 1 Cumulative Response to Guselkumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Introduction: Guselkumab (GUS), an IL-23p19 antagonist, had greater efficacy than placebo (PBO) in achieving clinical response and clinical remission atWeek (Wk) 12 in the randomized, controlled Phase 2b QUASAR Induction Study 1 (NCT04033445) in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).1 Patients who were not in clinical response at Wk 12 received GUS treatment through Wk 24. Here, we report GUS cumulative efficacy and safety results for Induction Study 1. Method(s): Eligible patients had moderately to severely active UC (modified Mayo score of 5 to 9 with a Mayo endoscopy subscore >=2) at baseline. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to IV GUS 200mg, 400mg, or PBO at Wks 0, 4, and 8. Patients who were not in clinical response to IV induction at Wk 12 received GUS treatment (PBO IV->GUS 200mg IV;GUS 200mg IV->GUS 200mg SC;GUS 400mg IV->GUS 200mg SC) at Wks 12, 16, and 20 and were evaluated at Wk 24 (Figure). Matching IV or SC PBO was administered to maintain the blind. Result(s): Three hundred thirteen patients were randomized and treated at baseline. Demographic and disease characteristics at baseline were similar among the treatment groups, and approximately 50% had a prior inadequate response or intolerance to advanced UC therapy. AtWk 12, clinical response was achieved by 61.4% (62/101) and 60.7% (65/107) of patients randomized to GUS 200mg and GUS 400mg IV vs 27.6 % (29/105) of patients randomized to PBO IV (both p< 0.001). Of the patients in the GUS groups who were not in clinical response at Wk 12, 54.3% (19/35) in the GUS 200mg IV->200mg SC group and 50.0% (19/38) in the GUS 400mg IV->200mg SC group achieved clinical response at Wk 24. Clinical response atWk 12 or 24 was achieved by 80.2% of patients who were randomized to GUS 200mg IV and 78.5% of patients who were randomized to GUS 400mg IV. For patients who received PBO IV->GUS 200mg IV, clinical response at Wk 24 (65.2%) was similar toWk 12 clinical response following GUS 200mg IV induction (61.4%). The most frequent adverse events among all GUS-treated pts (n=274) were anemia (7.7%), headache (5.1%), worsening UC (4.4%), COVID-19 (3.6%), arthralgia (2.9%) and abdominal pain (2.6%) which are consistent with Wk 12 results. Conclusion(s): Overall, approximately 80% of patients randomized to receive GUS achieved clinical response at Wk 12 or 24. Continued treatment with SC GUS allowed 50-54.3% of IV GUS Wk 12 clinical nonresponders to achieve clinical response at Wk 24. No new safety concerns for GUS were identified. (Figure Presented).

QUASAR Induction Study 1 Cumulative Response to Guselkumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Background: Guselkumab (GUS), an IL-23p19 antagonist, had greater efficacy than placebo (PBO) in achieving clinical response and clinical remission at Week (Wk) 12 in the randomized, controlled Phase 2b QUASAR Induction Study 1 (NCT04033445) in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).1 Patients who were not in clinical response at Wk 12 received GUS treatment through Wk 24. Here, we report GUS cumulative efficacy and safety results for Induction Study 1. Method(s): Eligible patients had moderately to severely active UC (modified Mayo score of 5 to 9 with a Mayo endoscopy subscore >=2) at baseline. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to IV GUS 200mg, 400mg, or PBO at Wks 0, 4, and 8. Patients who were not in clinical response to IV induction at Wk 12 received GUS treatment (PBO IVGUS 200mg IV;GUS 200mg IV->GUS 200mg SC;GUS 400mg IV->GUS 200mg SC) at Wks 12, 16, and 20 and were evaluated at Wk 24 (Figure 1). Matching IV or SC PBO was administered to maintain the blind. Result(s): Three hundred thirteen patients were randomized and treated at baseline. Demographic and disease characteristics at baseline were similar among the treatment groups, and approximately 50% had a prior inadequate response or intolerance to advanced UC therapy. At Wk 12, clinical response was achieved by 61.4% (62/101) and 60.7% (65/107) of patients randomized to GUS 200mg and GUS 400mg IV vs 27.6% (29/105) of patients randomized to PBO IV (both p<0.001). Of the patients in the GUS groups who were not in clinical response at Wk 12, 54.3% (19/35) in the GUS 200mg IV->200mg SC group and 50.0% (19/38) in the GUS 400mg IV->200mg SC group achieved clinical response at Wk 24. Clinical response at Wk 12 or 24 was achieved by 80.2% of patients who were randomized to GUS 200mg IV and 78.5% of patients who were randomized to GUS 400mg IV. For patients who received PBO IV->GUS 200mg IV, clinical response at Wk 24 (65.2%) was similar to Wk 12 clinical response following GUS 200mg IV induction (61.4%). The most frequent adverse events among all GUS-treated pts (n=274) were anemia (7.7%), headache (5.1%), worsening UC (4.4%), COVID-19 (3.6%), arthralgia (2.9%) and abdominal pain (2.6%) which are consistent with Wk 12 results. Conclusion(s): Overall, approximately 80% of patients randomized to receive GUS achieved clinical response at Wk 12 or 24. Continued treatment with SC GUS allowed 50-54.3% of IV GUS Wk 12 clinical nonresponders to achieve clinical response at Wk 24. No new safety concerns for GUS were identified.

Effect of upadacitinib on inflammatory markers and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease in the phase 3, U-EXCEL, U-EXCEED, and U-ENDURE studies

Background: Improvement in clinical outcomes and normalisation of objective markers of inflammation, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FCP), are considered treatment targets per STRIDE-II guidelines.1 We evaluated the effect of the oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) on changes in hs-CRP, FCP, and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Method(s): In 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction studies (U-EXCEL, NCT03345849;U-EXCEED, NCT03345836), patients with moderate-to-severe CD received 12-week treatment with UPA 45 mg (UPA45) once daily (QD) or placebo (PBO). Patients with clinical response to UPA45 were rerandomised in U-ENDURE (NCT03345823) to receive 52-week maintenance treatment with UPA 30 mg QD (UPA30), UPA 15 mg QD (UPA15), or PBO. Endpoints included marker normalisation (hs-CRP <= 5 mg/L, FCP <= 250 mug/g) in patients with elevated baseline marker levels, normal marker and clinical remission by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI < 150) or very soft/liquid stool frequency (SF)/abdominal pain score (APS) (average daily SF <= 2.8 and average daily APS <= 1, neither greater than baseline), and >= 50% reduction from baseline in marker values with a decrease of at least 100 points in CDAI from baseline. Median changes from baseline in marker levels were also evaluated. Non-responder imputation with no special data handling for missing data due to COVID-19 was used. Result(s): Of 1021 enrolled patients, 645 (63.2%) had elevated hs-CRP (> 5 mg/L) and 750 (73.5%) had elevated FCP (> 250 mug/g) levels at baseline. Significantly greater proportions of patients with elevated baseline marker levels achieved normalisation with UPA compared with PBO at week 12 (Fig 1A/B) and week 52 (Fig 2A/B;nominal P < .001 for all). Decreases in marker levels from baseline with UPA were observed as early as week 2 and were significantly greater than with PBO through week 12 (Fig 1C) and week 52 (Fig 2C;nominal P < .001 for all). Patients achieved clinical endpoints and improvements in markers at significantly higher rates with UPA45 vs PBO at week 12 (Fig 1D-F) and with UPA15 and UPA30 vs PBO at week 52 (Fig 2D-F;P < .001 for all). The safety profile of UPA in CD was previously reported and no new safety concerns were identified. Conclusion(s): Improvements in clinical endpoints and normalisation of objective markers of inflammation were achieved as early as week 2 with UPA45 induction and sustained with UPA15 and UPA30 maintenance therapy in patients with CD. Median changes in hs-CRP and FCP with UPA support continued improvement of inflammation up to week 52 .

Etrasimod 2mg Once Daily as Treatment for Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results from the Phase 3 Elevate Uc 52 and Elevate Uc 12 Trials

Introduction: Etrasimod (APD334), an investigational, once-daily, oral, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1,4,5 modulator, demonstrated efficacy in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) in the Phase 2 OASIS trial (NCT02447302). Here, we report data from 2 trials, ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, that evaluated the efficacy and safety of etrasimod 2mg for induction and maintenance in adults with UC. Aims & Methods: ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) and ELEVATE UC 12 (NCT03996369) were global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. In both trials, adults (16-80 years) with moderately to severely active UC (based on modified Mayo Score [MMS] of 4-9 with centrally read endoscopic subscore >=2 and rectal bleeding subscore >=1) and documented history of inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to >=1 treatment for UC were randomized 2:1 to once-daily treatment with etrasimod 2mg or placebo. Patients (pts) were stratified by previous exposure to biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) therapy, baseline corticosteroid use, and baseline disease activity (MMS 4-6 or 7-9). ELEVATE UC 52 utilized a treat-through design comprising a 12-week induction period followed by a 40-week maintenance period. Beginning at Week (Wk) 12, all pts could continue their randomized treatment;pts whose disease had not improved or had worsened compared to baseline (based on investigator judgement) could discontinue and enroll in an open-label extension study (NCT03950232). ELEVATE UC 12 comprised a 12-week induction period only. The primary efficacy endpoints were the proportion of pts achieving clinical remission (using the MMS) at Wk 12 and Wk 52 in ELEVATE UC 52, and at Wk 12 in ELEVATE UC 12. Safety was evaluated throughout the trials. Result(s): In ELEVATE UC 52, 433 pts were randomized (etrasimod, n=289;placebo, n=144) and 207 completed Wk 52. In ELEVATE UC 12, 354 pts were randomized (etrasimod, n=238;placebo, n=116) and 316 completed Wk 12. 62.6% of etrasimod-treated pts in both trials and 61.8% and 62.9% of placebo-treated pts in ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, respectively, were naive to biologic/JAKi therapy. All primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were achieved with etrasimod vs placebo at both Wks 12 and 52 in ELEVATE UC 52 and Wk 12 in ELEVATE UC 12 (Table). Most commonly reported TEAEs (>=3% of etrasimod-treated pts and greater than placebo in either trial) were headache, nausea, COVID-19 infection, dizziness, pyrexia, arthralgia, abdominal pain and worsening of UC. Serious AEs were similar between treatment groups in both trials. The overall safety profile was consistent with previous studies. Conclusion(s): Treatment with etrasimod 2mg resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements based on clinical, endoscopic, symptomatic, and endo-histologic endpoints at Wks 12 and 52 in adults with moderately to severely active UC. No new safety findings were observed with etrasimod 2mg treatment for up to 52 weeks.

SHORTER DISEASE DURATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH BETTER OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATELY TO SEVERELY ACTIVE CROHN'S DISEASE TREATED WITH RISANKIZUMAB: RESULTS FROM THE PHASE 3 ADVANCE, MOTIVATE, AND FORTIFY STUDIES

Background: An association between shorter disease duration and improved clinical efficacy has been shown in post hoc analyses of clinical trial data with biological therapies in Crohn’s disease (CD). The efficacy and safety of risankizumab (RZB) as induction and maintenance therapy have been recently reported.1,2 Here, the efficacy of RZB stratified by baseline CD duration is reported. Methods: In ADVANCE (NCT03105128) and MOTIVATE (NCT03104413), patients with moderately to severely active CD received intravenous (IV) RZB induction therapy or placebo (PBO) for 12 weeks. Patients with clinical response to RZB IV induction were re-randomised in a 52-week maintenance study (FORTIFY NCT03105102) to receive subcutaneous (SC) RZB or PBO (ie, withdrawal). For this posthoc analysis, patient subgroups were stratified by years of CD duration at baseline (< 2, 2– 5, > 5–10, and > 10 years). Induction analyses focused on patients who received RZB 600 mg IV or PBO for 12 weeks. As all patients who entered maintenance responded to RZB IV induction, maintenance analyses were limited to those patients who responded to induction and then received RZB 360 mg SC for 52 weeks. Clinical and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated using nonresponder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Safety was assessed throughout the studies. Results: The induction and maintenance analyses included 527 patients who received RZB 600 mg IV and 141 patients who received RZB 360 mg SC, respectively. At the end of induction (week 12), patients with CD duration of < 2 years achieved higher rates of endoscopic outcomes with IV RZB induction vs patients with longer durations of disease (Figure 1), and regardless of baseline CD duration, greater proportions of RZB-treated patients achieved clinical remission (defined by stool frequency and abdominal pain), endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and ulcer-free endoscopy vs PBO (P ≤ .05). Clinical remission rates at week 12 were numerically higher in patients with CD duration of < 5 years vs > 5 years (Figure 1). Similar results for improved clinical and endoscopic outcomes associated with shorter disease duration were observed at week 52 with RZB 360 mg SC maintenance treatment (Figure 2). RZB was well tolerated with lower rates of serious adverse events and serious infections vs PBO in induction, across CD duration subgroups. Conclusions: RZB induction and maintenance therapy was effective and well tolerated with a safety profile generally similar across CD duration subgroups. Achievement of clinical and endoscopic endpoints were higher in patients with shorter duration of CD, suggesting that earlier introduction of RZB therapy may lead to improved outcomes.

COVID-19: A PREVALENCE RATE TWO TIMES LOWER THAN THAT OF THE GENERAL POPULATION IN FRENCH PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE TREATED WITH INTRAVENOUS BIOLOGIC AGENTS

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), either Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), treated with immunosuppressants and/or biotherapy might have an altered immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of COVID-19 in a French cohort of IBD patients treated with infliximab or vedolizumab during the first epidemic wave and to identify factors associated with the risk of infection. Methods: All patients with IBD treated with infliximab or vedolizumab from March to June 2020 in 16 French centres were included and followed for 6 months. At baseline, clinical, demographic, family and socio-professional data were collected. At each of their day hospitalization, patients reported the occurrence of symptoms of COVID-19, and the performance of a diagnostic test, if so. Serum was collected at each visit to detect immunisation by SARS-CoV-2 at the end of follow-up and to measure trough levels. Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were frozen at each visit for 50% of patients to further analyse the immunological changes associated with COVID-19. Results: 1079 patients were included (CD n=690, mean age 41.6 years, mean disease duration 13.3 years). Clinical and demographic data at baseline are detailed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. 143 patients (13.3%) had one or more co-morbidities associated with a risk of severe COVID-19 (hypertension 5.6%, chronic lung disease 5%, diabetes 2.4%, obesity 0.3%). Over the 6 months of followup, 458 patients (42%) had active disease defined by an HBI score >4 or Mayo score >2 and/or treatment optimisation (dose increase, shortening of infusion interval, addition of an immunosuppressant or change of biotherapy). 111 patients (10.2%) received corticosteroids at least occasionally (self-medication was not excluded). 341 patients (32%) were tested for COVID-19 by nasal swab, of whom 23 were positive. Three patients were hospitalized. Regarding serology, in the first 13 centres analysed hitherto (886 patients), 20 patients were seropositive at the end of follow-up before the start of the vaccination campaign (January 2021), i.e. 2.2%, compared to 4.5% in the general population at the same period according to Santé Publique France data. Conclusion: The preliminary analysis of this French cohort confirms that patients with IBD are not at higher risk of severe COVID-19 despite the use of biotherapy and repeated hospital stays. This population was significantly less infected than the general population. Clinical, demographic and immunological factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection are being analysed as well as factors associated with a lower incidence of infection compared to the general population. (Table Presented) (Table Presented)

Immunomodulators are protective against severe covid 19: Results from a large multicentre cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients

Background: In the context of the Sars-Cov2 pandemic, the management of patients with chronic diseases and/or receiving immunosuppressive drugs was of concern due to lack of data to dictate their management. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the characteristics and prognosis of COVID-19 among IBD patients and to study the factors associated with severe COVID-19. Methods: We carried out a multicentre bispective study in 30 French GETAID centres. Participating centres were asked to report all consecutive COVID19 cases occurring in their IBD-cohort between March,1st and December,31st 2020. The cases had to be confirmed by a PCR test, or by a chest CT scan demonstrating COVID19 lesions. In addition to the baseline examination, patients were scheduled for a follow up visit within 3-6 months following their infection. Demographics, disease characteristics, treatments, and the clinical course of IBD were prospectively recorded. Severe COVID-19 was defined as admission to the hospital >1 day and/or use of oxygen therapy and/or death. Predictive factors for developing severe COVID-19 were explored using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: A total of 719 IBD patients with COVID 19 were included;54.2% were women, median age was 42 years, 64.4% had Crohn's disease (CD), and median disease duration was 10.8 years. 13.3% of the patients were active smokers;12.7% had a BMI>30. With respect to the treatment, 72(10%) patients were not on any IBD medication, 75(10.4%) were only receiving 5-ASA, 164(22.8%) received conventional immunosuppressants, and 509(70.8%) biologics.21.6% of the patients developed either diarrhoea in remitters, or an exacerbation of diarrhoea in active patients. IBD treatments were maintained unchanged, suspended or discontinued in 73.4%, 25.5%, and 1.1% of the patients. Over the follow-up period, 13.2% of the patients had a flare. A total of 68 patients developed severe COVID 19, 67(9.3%) were hospitalized for a median duration of 6 days, and 4(0.6%) patients died. In multivariate analysis, age > 50 years (OR: 2.0,CI:1.06-3.72;p=0.031), obesity (OR: 2.01,CI:1.05-4.09;p=0.037), and comorbidities (OR: 3.28,CI:1.76-6.09;p=0.0002) were factors associated with the occurrence of severe COVID 19;while immunomodulatory treatment (biologic and/or immunosuppressant) was a protective factor for developing severe COVID 19 (OR: 0.38,CI: 0.22-0.69;p=0.0012). Conclusion: Rate of severe COVID 19 in this cohort of IBD patients was corresponding to the general population with similar risk factors for severity, i.e., age, obesity and comorbidities. Prescription of immunomodulators was protective against severe COVID 19, raising the hypothesis of their potential immunological effect on the immune storm phase of Sars-Cov2.

Shorter disease duration is associated with better outcomes in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's Disease treated with risankizumab: Results from the phase 3 ADVANCE, MOTIVATE, and FORTIFY studies

Background: An association between shorter disease duration and improved clinical efficacy has been shown in post hoc analyses of clinical trial data with biological therapies in Crohn's disease (CD). The efficacy and safety of risankizumab (RZB) as induction and maintenance therapy have been recently reported. Here, the efficacy of RZB stratified by baseline CD duration is reported. Methods: In ADVANCE (NCT03105128) and MOTIVATE (NCT03104413), patients with moderately to severely active CD received intravenous (IV) RZB induction therapy or placebo (PBO) for 12 weeks. Patients with clinical response to RZB IV induction were re-randomised in a 52-week maintenance study (FORTIFY, NCT03105102) to receive subcutaneous (SC) RZB or PBO (ie, withdrawal). For this post-hoc analysis, patient subgroups were stratified by years of CD duration at baseline (< 2, 2-5, > 5-10, and > 10 years). Induction analyses focused on patients who received RZB 600 mg IV or PBO for 12 weeks. As all patients who entered maintenance responded to RZB IV induction, maintenance analyses were limited to those patients who responded to induction and then received RZB 360 mg SC for 52 weeks. Clinical and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated using nonresponder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Safety was assessed throughout the studies. Results: The induction and maintenance analyses included 527 patients who received RZB 600 mg IV and 141 patients who received RZB 360 mg SC, respectively. At the end of induction (week 12), patients with CD duration of < 2 years achieved higher rates of endoscopic outcomes with IV RZB induction vs patients with longer durations of disease (Figure 1), and regardless of baseline CD duration, greater proportions of RZB-treated patients achieved clinical remission (defined by stool frequency and abdominal pain), endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and ulcer-free endoscopy vs PBO (P ≤ .05). Clinical remission rates at week 12 were numerically higher in patients with CD duration of < 5 years vs > 5 years (Figure 1). Similar results for improved clinical and endoscopic outcomes associated with shorter disease duration were observed at week 52 with RZB 360 mg SC maintenance treatment (Figure 2). RZB was well tolerated with lower rates of serious adverse events and serious infections vs PBO in induction, across CD duration subgroups. Conclusion: RZB induction and maintenance therapy was effective and well tolerated with a safety profile generally similar across CD duration subgroups. Achievement of clinical and endoscopic endpoints were higher in patients with shorter duration of CD, suggesting that earlier introduction of RZB therapy may lead to improved outcomes.

Safety of Drugs During Previous and Current Coronavirus Pandemics: Lessons for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The coronavirus 2019 [COVID-19] pandemic has posed challenges in the routine care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. One of the key challenges is quantification of the risks of immunosuppressive and biological therapies in IBD patients during the pandemic. The similarities and differences between previous coronavirus outbreaks and the pathobiology of the infections can give useful information in understanding the risks, and perhaps potential beneficial aspects of drugs used in IBD. Although clinical, immunological and pharmacological data from the experience with previous coronavirus outbreaks cannot be automatically translated to predict the safety of IBD therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic, the signals so far from these outbreaks on IBD patients who are on immunomodulators and biologics are reassuring to patients and clinicians alike.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management During the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Ten Do's and Don'ts from the ECCO-COVID Taskforce.

Our knowledge of COVID-19 is changing and evolving rapidly, with novel insights and recommendations, almost on a daily basis. It behooves the medical community to provide updated information on a regular basis, on best practice to facilitate optimal care of infected patients and on appropriate advice for the general population. This is particularly important in the case of patients with chronic conditions, such as inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. In this review, we have compiled existing evidence on the impact of COVID-19 in IBD patients and provide guidance on the most appropriate care to adopt during the pandemic. Our review highlights that IBD, per se, is not a risk factor for COVID-19. However, all IBD patients with symptoms should be tested for SARS-CoV-2 and the procedures for disease management should be carefully adapted: [i] in SARS-CoV-2-positive IBD patients, medical treatments should be re-evaluated [with a particular focus on corticosteroids] always with the purpose of treating active disease and maintaining remission; [ii] non-urgent surgeries and endoscopic procedures should be postponed for all patients; [iii] online consultancy should be implemented; and [iv] hospitalization and surgery should be limited to life-threatening situations.